pt., 6 paź 2023 o 11:22 Kusal Kithul-Godage <kkithulgod...@atlassian.com.invalid> napisał(a): > So if I'm understanding correctly, we lack sufficient ownership and > control over the release process at commons-ognl.
Rather they have more strict process which requires some extra work to get approval, eg. you must keep changes.xml up & date and so on. With having code on Github I'm able to push a new release within a few minutes rather than days. > I do still think it's worthwhile to try and unify these projects. > Having the project under an 'orphan' org does not inspire confidence > in its maintenance status, nor that of Struts. It also is not > encouraging for developers looking to contribute. For developers such > as myself who contribute on company time, there may also be additional > legal hurdles to contributing, such as a corporate CLA. We can try again, yet the current changes in 3.x are not compatible with commons-ognl 4.x and basically this means re-importing the project again. Regards -- Łukasz + 48 606 323 122 http://www.lenart.org.pl/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscr...@struts.apache.org For additional commands, e-mail: dev-h...@struts.apache.org
