+1 on creating a new branch, towards an eventual .6 release On Wed, Jul 1, 2009 at 11:07 AM, Christian Gruber < [email protected]> wrote:
> +1 (not only non-binding, but with considerable conflict of interest, since > I'm the one badgering Howard et. al. to have this happen ;) > > > > On Jul 1, 2009, at 12:14 PM, Robert Zeigler wrote: > > Looking to apply the patch in this ticket; I can apply it to trunk, but it >> looks like there's also a strong sentiment in favor of applying the patch to >> the 5.1 release, as well (and, eventually, releasing 5.1.0.6). Any qualms >> with me making a 5.1.0.6 branch based on the 5.1.0.5 release? >> >> Robert >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] >> >> > Christian Edward Gruber > [email protected] > http://www.geekinasuit.com/ > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected] > For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > > -- Howard M. Lewis Ship Creator of Apache Tapestry Director of Open Source Technology at Formos
