On 10/20/05, Mladen Turk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems there is low interest on JK 1.2.15 although it resolves > lots of issues compared with released 1.2.14.1 :( > > Do you guys find something that would prevent 1.2.15 to > be declared as stable that I'm missing?
I found 1.2.15 to be stable under all loads I've been able to throw at it on Fedora Core 1 and 4, RHEL 3 and SGI IRIX. I would give it a +1 if I were a committer. -Dave --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
