DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG· RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT <http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36994>. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND· INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36994 ------- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2005-12-22 21:19 ------- (In reply to comment #5) > No the spec didn't change. However, it turned out that getId should have > thrown > an ISE, while in Tomcat it did not. If you want to work around it, you can > modify the Tomcat code easily. > > http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/maintenance/jsr154/errata204.txt > The final 2.4 spec. http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/final/jsr154/index.html doesn't contain no information that HttpSession::getId() may throw the ISE. In the current maintenance draft review http://jcp.org/aboutJava/communityprocess/maintenance/jsr154/index3.html the ISE is documented. In my opinion this change will have a deep impact to a lot of frameworks which e.g. try to access the session's id to remove it from a HashMap. -- Configure bugmail: http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
