2016-10-26 20:04 GMT+02:00 Rainer Jung <rainer.j...@kippdata.de>: > Am 26.10.2016 um 16:02 schrieb Rémy Maucherat: > >> 2016-10-26 15:32 GMT+02:00 Romain Manni-Bucau <rmannibu...@gmail.com>: >> >> If I got the original issue right, it is only about allowing a user to >>> replace the default (JULi) so should be acceptable, no? >>> >>> Right, but once you place your logging framework in the main CL, you >>> could >>> >> run into issues. The default is indeed not affected. >> > > Understood, there's lots of ways to do it wrong and disturb a webapp > provided Log4J2 instance when adding one to the main CL. Nevertheless I > like the advanced features of the fully fledged log framework and Log4J2 > got much better allowing to do it right. > > +1
Rémy
