Following on from this there has been another problem found in 1.3 with the new generated wsdl - http://apache.markmail.org/message/fryloi6byuyjqvrl for which I've raised TUSCANY-2480, could someone take a look at that as I'm out the rest of the week otherwise i'll pick it up on Monday.
What i think we should do is plan on having an RC2 next Tuesday which will give time for the two problems to be fixed with the hope that that is the final RC so we'd get the release officially out by the end of next week. For that to work RC2 needs to be good, i'm a bit worried about that as there's only been two people who have posted that they've reviewed RC1 so far. Be a shame if we need an RC3 because of a problem that could have been found in RC1 - if you have time please review: http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7 ...ant On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 10:36 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > An update on 1.3 for those watching this thread: > > - a release candidate is available for review at > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1a/>with > comments to this VOTE thread: > http://apache.markmail.org/message/fmlak6bfhentybf7 > > - waiting for a final fix before making a new release candidate as > discussed in this thread: > http://apache.markmail.org/message/tuomadm4b3kubgjn > > ...ant > > On Wed, Jul 9, 2008 at 9:29 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Quite a few updates to the 1.3 branch over night so it looks like we need >> a new RC1, here's what I think we should do: >> >> - I'm not sure if there are still things outstanding so I'll leave the 1.3 >> branch open for updates till tomorrow >> - tomorrow I'll re tag and respin RC1 and call a vote on that >> - after then the 1.3 branch goes to RTC so updates to trunk and raise a >> JIRA against 1.3 if you want a change in 1.3 >> - plan on likely needing an RC2 early next week to fix any issues found in >> RC1 >> >> This should get a 1.3 out late next week. We can have a 1.3.1 in the near >> future to pick up things that miss 1.3. Does this sound ok to everyone to >> get what they need in 1.3 or 1.3.1? >> >> In the meantime the distros at >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/>are >> still useful for reviewing if anyone has the time and inclination. >> >> ...ant >> >> >> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:15 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> This is excellent help, thanks Yang. >>> >>> Note I've created a new RC1 distro which includes the correctly built >>> jars with out the shade plugin problem so that can be used to test the >>> standalone samples, see >>> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3-RC1/> >>> >>> Will wait and see how things go today before deciding to call a vote on >>> that or spin a new RC before calling a vote - everyone, reviews of this RC >>> are welcome! >>> >>> ...ant >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Jul 8, 2008 at 10:07 AM, Sun Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> Got it. I will retest them tomorrow. >>>> >>>> Best Regards, >>>> Yang Sun >>>> >>>> 2008/7/8 Feng Wang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>> >>>> Hi,Sun >>>>> >>>>> On Websphere, you must set application properties to use the >>>>> application class loader before the parent container class loader. >>>>> There is an explanation on the Sebastien's blog. >>>>> >>>>> http://jsdelfino.blogspot.com/2007/10/how-to-use-apache-tuscany-with.html >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Feng Wang >>>>> >>>>> On 2008-07-08 15:32:55,Sun Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >Hi, Simon: >>>>> > >>>>> >I did a test against Tomcat 5.5.26 and Websphere 6.1 with JDK 1.5 >>>>> based on >>>>> >your package. >>>>> > >>>>> >The webapps in samples directory all passed the tests in Tomcat >>>>> 5.5.26. >>>>> > >>>>> >While in Websphere 6.1, the result is not good. >>>>> >calculator-webapp pass >>>>> >feed-aggregator-webapp pass >>>>> >------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >calculator-ws-webapp failed >>>>> >helloworld-ws-sdo-webapp failed >>>>> >The log trace is attached. I am guessing some class confliction there. >>>>> >------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> >helloworld-dojo-webapp failed >>>>> >helloworld-jsonrpc-webapp failed >>>>> >No expected response. A screenshot for helloworld-dojo-webapp is >>>>> attached. >>>>> > >>>>> >Thanks, >>>>> >Yang Sun >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> >2008/7/5 Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>> > >>>>> >> >>>>> >> >>>>> >> On Sat, Jul 5, 2008 at 6:43 AM, Sun Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >> >>>>> >>> Hi, Simon: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> I am not sure whether it is a bit late. I can commit 1-2 hours/day >>>>> to help >>>>> >>> you do this testing (tomcat 5, websphere). >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> If you need my help, please reply me. >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Regards, >>>>> >>> Yang Sun >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> 2008/7/2 Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >>>>> >>> >>>>> >>> Some more JIRA have been closed out but there are still some that >>>>> need >>>>> >>>> attention and remain unassigned. See the list at >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&fixfor=12313221&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> The ones I see at the moment are... >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2409 - There is a >>>>> >>>> discussion thread on this ( >>>>> >>>> http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@tuscany.apache.org/msg00433.html) >>>>> so I >>>>> >>>> would like to bring that to a conclusion ASAP. >>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2417 - personally I >>>>> don't >>>>> >>>> think we need to reinstate auto port selection. If we can agree >>>>> this is an >>>>> >>>> easy fix >>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2419 - >>>>> >>>> sample/helloworld-bpel needs some love >>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2441 - >>>>> demo/xml-bigbank >>>>> >>>> also needs attention >>>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2442 - we need to >>>>> sort out >>>>> >>>> remaining references to incubator/ing >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Other things that need to be done. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Test the web apps on different containers. I need volunteers for >>>>> Tomcat5, >>>>> >>>> Geronimo, WebSphere >>>>> >>>> Do the legal checking >>>>> >>>> We need to either release the parent pom or fix the sca pom. I'm >>>>> waiting >>>>> >>>> for a reply from Ant as he made the suggestion re. fixing up the >>>>> sca pom. >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> As before the release status summary is at >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/R1.3+Checklist >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> I'd like to get an RC for voting on before the end of this week. >>>>> All help >>>>> >>>> is gratefully received either fixing the things we know about >>>>> already or >>>>> >>>> looking at RC0 which is here >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~slaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/> >>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Eslaws/tuscany/1.3-RC0/> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> Simon >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>>> >>> >>>>> >> Great, thanks for the offer Sun. Am just about to post about RC1. If >>>>> you >>>>> >> find any issues raise a JIRA against 1.3 >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Thanks >>>>> >> >>>>> >> Simon >>>>> >> >>>>> > >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >
