On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 24, 2008 at 11:42 AM, Dave Sowerby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > >> Hi guys, >> >> I've just reopened TUSCANY-2531 as the fixes made have only resolved >> the issues faced when using wsimport, but not wsdl2java - the ability >> for a native client to use this tooling is quite important to us as it >> can be executed on java 1.4 clients. >> >> Unfortunately, this does make my vote -1 for this RC. >> >> Cheers, >> >> Dave. >> >> -- >> Dave Sowerby MEng MBCS >> >> >> >> On Sat, Aug 23, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Vamsavardhana Reddy >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > +1 >> > >> > ++Vamsi >> > >> > On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 5:43 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> The release artifacts for the Tuscany SCA for Java 1.3.1 release are >> now >> >> available, please review and vote to release. >> >> >> >> The artifacts are available for at: >> >> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/1.3.1-RC1/> >> >> >> >> This includes the signed binary and source distributions, Maven staging >> >> repository, and eclipse update site and RAT reports. >> >> >> >> The SVN tag for the release is: >> >> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/tuscany/tags/java/sca/1.3.1 >> >> >> >> +1 to release from me. >> >> >> >> ...ant >> > >> > >> > > I looks like Simon has run > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2531 to ground to the extent > it looks like we are generating WSDL in accordance with the JAXB spec but > that several WSDL2Java tools are not able to cope with this. So for an > actual fix we are a bit stuck at the moment. He has suggested a work around > which involves adding JAXB annotations to Java classes to force a namespace > to appear. Dave, is this practical for you for the time being? > > As for the Geronimo issue (http://markmail.org/message/xb4m72afvn5xg67e) > can someone comment if this is being worked on? From the mails it looks like > either a Geronimo problem or a spec problem. Either of these will take some > time to fix. Do people think we can hold this over and do a 1.3.2? We have > been waiting a while to get 1.3.1 out and nobody has actually asked for the > Geronimo fix. > > Simon > If Dave can live with the TUSCANY-2531 work around for now then I agree we should get 1.3.1 out and leave any other issues for the next release. Note for that to happen we still need another PMC +1 vote on 1.3.1, any other PMCers care to vote pending Dave's reply? ...ant
