On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:10 PM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Oct 13, 2008 at 2:08 AM, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I'm wondering if we can combine the Endpoint and RRB efforts together. >> Here are some ideas: >> >> 1) An SCA service has a list of Endpoints representing the end point for >> each binding protocol. >> >> 2) An SCA reference has 0..N Endpoints depending on the multiplicity of >> the reference. >> >> 3) Each endpoint has a binding interface contract. If it's not known >> before the operation selector, then it's an "Any" interface with an "Any" >> operation. >> >> 4) There is one invocation chain for each endpoint (based on the binding >> interface contract) and one for the SCA service or reference. The two >> invocation chains are connected as we described on the wiki page. For a SCA >> service configured with multiple bindings, there will be multiple endpoint >> invocation chains connecting to the same service invocation chain. It's >> similar for SCA references. >> >> Thanks, >> Raymond >> >> > From all the discussion I know what the RRB is but are there any emails or > doc you could point to saying what the endpoint effort is about? Or if there > are not yet could you give a quick summary? > > ...ant > > Hi Ant Touche, you got this mail precisely the same time as I did:-) We talked about extending the endoint support a while back (It's on the roadmap page [1]) and it was discussed on the ML back in June [2]. Sebastien subsequently raised a JIRA and referenced the mail list [3]. I think it's a good idea to bring this up again now as it is related to the RRB work. Simon [1] http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Roadmap+Discussion [2] http://marc.info/?l=tuscany-dev&m=121318046912690&w=2 [3] http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2382
