On 8/17/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > The future (> 1.3) relies on this functionality, and I guess an > upgrade from 1.2.3 -> 1.2.7 is not going to be a drop-in replacement > of a jar (was on the user list a month ago). > > I think that we should keep it. 1.2.6 is the currently most downloaded > release ever. Reverting the change would mean changing it twice for > upgraders to 1.3 which seems silly. > > It is unfortunate that this happened, and we should do a mea culpa, > document it, and fix the other 2 issues left for 1.2.7 and release it.
+1 Eelco
