it should be fixed now (lastmodified request/application thread local sets and that maybe in combination with a WicketServlet)
On 8/29/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > hmm that also doesn't fix it completely > > i am also diving into this, it is pretty complex now when you also take > the wicket servlet into account :( > > On 8/29/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I think that fixed it. > > > > Eelco > > > > On 8/28/07, Jan Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > I'll do that. > > > > > > Jan. > > > > > > Matej Knopp-2 wrote: > > > > > > > > That's not good. Can you please create a jira issue for this? > > > > > > > > -Matej > > > > > > > > On 8/28/07, Jan Vermeulen < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> The last changes made to WicketFilter (move Application.set > > > >> (webApplication) > > > >> from doGet() to doFilter()) have a side effect: if working with > > > >> WicketServlet (due to OSGI), the application is no longer set on > > the > > > >> current > > > >> thread, because it was moved to doFilter(). > > > >> > > > >> Can this be fixed ? > > > >> > > > >> Jan. > > > >> -- > > > >> View this message in context: > > > >> > > http://www.nabble.com/WicketServlet-no-longer-sets-application-on-current-thread-tf4342913.html#a12371848 > > > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > http://www.nabble.com/WicketServlet-no-longer-sets-application-on-current-thread-tf4342913.html#a12372441 > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > >
