to quote Matej ( http://www.nabble.com/forum/ViewPost.jtp?post=11611617&framed=y) "I built a page store using ehcache but it didn't really give any benefit, was actually slower that what we have now."
Gerolf On Jan 6, 2008 10:30 PM, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > You could make such a thing as an extentions project as a special > session store or ipagestore. But i dont see the big gain because its > not the reading (that doesnt happen a lot, or the writing (done in > separate thread)) the time is spend in serialization. But the overhead > we encountered was 20% or something like that. But the gain we have is > way less memory usage so in the end we can handle more clients with > 1.3 > > On 1/6/08, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on the subject of 2nd level cache stores, how feasible would it be to > use > > ehcache as a backing store? ehcache can store things in memory, and > overflow > > to disk making it a hybrid to our disk based storage. > > Is it reasonable to consider a caching solution such as ehcache to > provide > > the backend storage? > > > > Did we ever consider ehcache as an alternative? If so, why did we not > pick > > it? > > > > Martijn > > > > -- > > Buy Wicket in Action: http://manning.com/dashorst > > Apache Wicket 1.3.0 is released > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3.0 > > >
