Sure I could take whichever approach the core team prefers. A bonus of having a master issue is once it gets resolved that the release notes will specifically mark that it is compatible with GAE.
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 7:52 AM, Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org> wrote: > Why not prefix all issue titles with something like > > [GAE] problem description > > ? > > This should be easy to filter or lookup > > Am 20.09.2010 um 14:43 schrieb Clint Checketts: > > > There is a 'Will it play in app engine' page that tracks libraries that > are > > compatible with Google App Engine (aka GAE): > > > http://groups.google.com/group/google-appengine-java/web/will-it-play-in-app-engine?pli=1 > > > > Correctly, Wicket is listed as Semi-Compatible. > > > > As a project I've been looking through the Wicket codebase locating the > > pieces that need to change to make it fully compatible. Does it make > sense > > to have a master Jira that tracks the overall 'compatible with GAE' state > > while making individual issues for the specific changes that reference > back > > to the master issue? > > > > Thanks, > > > > -Clint Checketts > >
