Hi Sebastien,
the commit has been applied to branch 7.x. You can test 7.7.0-SNAPSHOT
or we can directly start a new release phase.
Andrea.
On 08/05/2017 17:52, Sebastien wrote:
Hi Andrea,
The issue is fixed in openjson, not committed to master yet but the
diffpatch is here:
https://github.com/openjson/openjson/commit/427087efb1c9d9d737cfbe237caf1c1812664a5c
As soon the fix is picked in wicket-6 / wicket-7, we should be able to roll
a new release...
Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.
On Sat, Apr 29, 2017 at 3:07 PM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>
wrote:
This vote has been canceled. We are waiting for
https://github.com/openjson/openjson/issues/8 to be solved.
On 23/04/2017 11:47, Sebastien wrote:
Hi Maxim,
Here we are: https://github.com/openjson/openjson/issues/8
Hope the explanation in there makes my idea clearer! :)
Thanks a lot,
Sebastien.
On Sun, Apr 23, 2017 at 5:47 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
wrote:
This is the thing I don't understand :(
to/from string is standard way of serializing/deserializing JSONObject
The original issue was regarding JSONObject constructing from "Bean
instanceof JSONString"
It make sense, Bean provide desired method of "being JSONObject", we
should
use this method in constructor
Maybe this discussion should be moved to github? so other openjson
contributors can participate?
