+0 to release The rewrite I'm currently doing is API compatible. I'm nearly finished though, so if we can wait one more day, I should be able to get it all working.
Emond On Thu, Apr 30, 2020 at 12:07 PM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote: > > +1 we have to cut it somewhere > > Sven > > > On 30.04.20 11:57, Andrea Del Bene wrote: > > +1 to release. The current state of 9.x is very stable and IMHO it > > shouldn't be delayed for major developments or refactoring. > > > > On 30/04/20 10:04, Tobias Soloschenko wrote: > >> +1 - lets release > >> > >> kind regards > >> > >> Tobias > >> > >>> Am 30.04.2020 um 09:43 schrieb Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com>: > >>> > >>> +1 > >>> let's release final version :) > >>> > >>>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 at 14:40, Martin Grigorov > >>>> <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hi team, > >>>> > >>>> Few weeks have passed since Wicket 9.0.0-M5 and there are no > >>>> stopper issues > >>>> being reported. > >>>> Let's release 9.0.0! > >>>> > >>>> I see few of you discuss refactoring some pretty critical area (from > >>>> performance PoV) of Wicket - the Component state, and suggesting some > >>>> bigger refactoring. I'd like this refactoring to be left for a later > >>>> release. If there are no API breaks it could be 9.0.1 but if there > >>>> will API > >>>> breaks then it will have to wait for Wicket 10. > >>>> > >>>> WDYT ? > >>>> > >>>> Martin > >>> > >>> > >>> -- > >>> Best regards, > >>> Maxim
