Guys, Thanks for your efforts with this release. Any updates when it will the binaries will be promoted? cheers Cam
On Thu, Nov 19, 2015 at 11:51 AM, Chris Nauroth <[email protected]> wrote: > +1 (non-binding) > > - Downloaded tarball and verified signature and checksums. > - Verified correct version information in src/c/include/winconfig.h. > - Confirmed full distro builds successfully on Linux, Windows and Solaris. > - All unit tests passed. > - Deployed a 3-node cluster. > - Tested various zkCli commands. > - Tested various 4-letter words. > - Killed the leader and verified a new leader was elected among the > remaining 2 nodes. > - ZOOKEEPER-1077: Confirmed native client builds on Solaris. > - ZOOKEEPER-1927: Confirmed zkServer.sh can execute on Solaris. > - ZOOKEEPER-1949: Confirmed presence of recipes jar in distro. > - ZOOKEEPER-2227: Confirmed stmk works. > > > Thank you for your efforts on this release, Raúl! > > --Chris Nauroth > > > > > On 11/10/15, 11:17 PM, "Raúl Gutiérrez Segalés" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > >This is a bugfix release candidate for 3.4.7. It fixes 79 issues, > >including > >issues that affect followers after elections, being unable to delete a > >node > >when it has no children, crashes with random input from the network on the > >QuorumCnxManager, deadlocks during bad network conditions and others. > > > >The full release notes is available at: > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ReleaseNote.jspa?projectId=12310801&; > >version=12325149 > > > >*** Please download, test and vote by November 25th 2015, 23:59 UTC+0. *** > > > >Source files: > >http://people.apache.org/~rgs/zookeeper-3-4-7-rc0/ > > > >Maven staging repo: > > > https://repository.apache.org/content/groups/staging/org/apache/zookeeper/ > >zookeeper/3.4.7/ > > > >The tag to be voted upon: > >https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/zookeeper/tags/release-3.4.7-rc0 > > > >ZooKeeper's KEYS file containing PGP keys we use to sign the release: > >http://www.apache.org/dist/zookeeper/KEYS > > > >Should we release this candidate? > > > >Note that the approval is by lazy majority according to the bylaws and > >only > >PMC votes are binding. > >
