Mario Noboa wrote:
Hi Stipe, few days ago i did a stress test with an operator, kannel worked
very well with 30 msg/s. But i had problems with more than 40 msg/s in a
smpp conexion. I set throughput=6 and max-pending-submits=50 but didn't
work.
This error appears for each messange sent:
2005-09-02 11:15:51 [11943] [11] WARNING: SMPP[COM]: SMSC sent
submit_sm_resp with wrong sequence number 0x0001001d
I have a CPU system with 2 Gb and 1200 MHz. How would i configure kannel for
this stress test?
Hi Mario,
now in terms of this WARNING, it means, Kannel received an submit_sm_resp PDU
from the SMPP SMSC with a sequence number that was not within the dictonary of
"still open" sequence number PDUs.
Obviously there may be 2 possible reasons:
a) a race-condition within the Kannel handling. Actually bearerbox transmitting
the submit_sm PDU and receiving the _resp PDU "faster" then being able to drop
the message in the "still open dictonary". Which is almost uncertain, due to the
amount of only 50 msg/sec.
b) a problem on the SMSC side itself. Which seems more reasonable.
I'd suggest that you do various tests on there again and try to circle in the
problem scope. I do assume that you may not be able to reproduce the effect on a
determenestic base, right?
Stipe
mailto:stolj_{at}_wapme-group.de
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Wapme Systems AG
Vogelsanger Weg 80
40470 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany
phone: +49.211.74845.0
fax: +49.211.74845.299
mailto:info_{at}_wapme-systems.de
http://www.wapme-systems.de/
-------------------------------------------------------------------
