Hi,
here are some modifications I made to EMI UCP. The patch should be
applied only if the previous patches I sent are applied before. This
patch just adds a skeleton for the answer to 02, 03, 57 and 58 ot and
move the code that produce the SM field for the answer to 0x ot in a
function.
I'm currently running some conformity tests on kannel for EMI UCP, and
I'd like to add the missing functionalities, but it seems like there's
not a lot of commit on CVS for a long time. Will all the patches that
have been sent for the last months be applied ?
Regards,
--
Colin Pitrat (Bull Services Telco)
Bull, Architect of an Open World (TM)
Tél : +33 (0) 1 30 80 72 93
www.bull.com
diff -ur gateway/gw/smsc/emimsg.c gateway-new/gw/smsc/emimsg.c
--- gateway/gw/smsc/emimsg.c 2005-02-11 16:35:48.000000000 +0100
+++ gateway-new/gw/smsc/emimsg.c 2006-08-23 15:26:57.000000000 +0200
@@ -113,11 +113,17 @@
switch (ot) {
case 01:
return SZ01;
+ case 02:
+ return SZ02;
+ case 03:
+ return SZ03;
case 31:
return 2;
case 51:
case 52:
case 53:
+ case 57:
+ case 58:
return SZ50;
case 60:
return SZ60;
@@ -133,12 +139,16 @@
{
switch(ot) {
case 01:
+ case 02:
+ case 03:
return posit ? 2 : 3;
case 31:
return posit ? 2 : 3;
case 51:
case 52:
case 53:
+ case 57:
+ case 58:
return 3;
case 60:
return posit ? 2 : 3;
diff -ur gateway/gw/smsc/emimsg.h gateway-new/gw/smsc/emimsg.h
--- gateway/gw/smsc/emimsg.h 2005-02-11 16:35:48.000000000 +0100
+++ gateway-new/gw/smsc/emimsg.h 2006-08-23 15:26:22.000000000 +0200
@@ -81,6 +81,13 @@
E01_ADC, E01_OADC, E01_AC, E01_MT, E01_AMSG, SZ01
};
+enum {
+ E02_NPL, E02_RAD, E02_OADC, E02_AC, E02_MT, E02_AMSG, SZ02
+};
+
+enum {
+ E03_RAD, E03_OADC, E03_AC, E03_NPL, E03_RP, E03_PR, E03_LPR, E03_UR,
E03_LUR, E03_RC, E03_LRC, E03_DD, E03_DDT, E03_MT, E03_AMSG, SZ03
+};
/* All the 50-series messages have the same number of fields */
enum {
diff -ur gateway/gw/smsc/smsc_emi.c gateway-new/gw/smsc/smsc_emi.c
--- gateway/gw/smsc/smsc_emi.c 2006-08-18 15:53:59.000000000 +0200
+++ gateway-new/gw/smsc/smsc_emi.c 2006-08-23 15:31:35.000000000 +0200
@@ -159,6 +159,35 @@
(PRIVDATA(conn)->keepalive > 0) &&
\
(time(NULL) > (PRIVDATA(conn)->last_activity_time +
PRIVDATA(conn)->keepalive)))
+/*
+ * Create the SM field for operation 0x :
+ * an Octstr * of the form "Adc:SCTS" with :
+ * AdC = Address code recipient, max 16 digits
+ * SCTS = Service center time stamp DDMMYYhhmmss
+ */
+Octstr *create_0x_SM_field(Octstr *AdC)
+{
+ time_t t_time;
+ struct tm tm_time;
+ // 13 because the timestamp format is DDMMYYhhmmss
+ char timestamp[13];
+ Octstr *separator;
+ Octstr *tmpstr;
+ Octstr *tmpstr2;
+ Octstr *result;
+
+ separator = octstr_create(":");
+ tmpstr = octstr_cat(AdC, separator);
+ time(&t_time);
+ gw_strftime(timestamp, sizeof(timestamp), "%d%m%y%H%M%S",
localtime_r(&t_time, &tm_time));
+ tmpstr2 = octstr_create(timestamp);
+ result = octstr_cat(tmpstr, tmpstr2);
+ octstr_destroy(tmpstr);
+ octstr_destroy(tmpstr2);
+ octstr_destroy(separator);
+ return result;
+}
+
/*
* Send an EMI message and update the last_activity_time field.
*/
@@ -596,6 +625,10 @@
switch(octstr_get_char(emimsg->fields[E01_MT], 0))
{
case '2':
+ /*
+ * Bull, Colin Pitrat, 18/08/2006 :
+ * Not handling MT=2 (Numeric message)
+ */
if (emimsg->fields[E01_AMSG] == NULL)
emimsg->fields[E01_AMSG] = octstr_create("");
msg->sms.msgdata = emimsg->fields[E01_AMSG];
@@ -653,29 +686,7 @@
msg->sms.smsc_id = octstr_duplicate(conn->id);
bb_smscconn_receive(conn, msg);
reply = emimsg_create_reply(01, emimsg->trn, 1, privdata->name);
- /*
- * Reply should contain SM as field 2 which is AdC:SCTS with :
- * AdC = Address code recipient, max 16 digits
- * SCTS = Service center time stamp DDMMYYhhmmss
- */
- {
- time_t t_time;
- struct tm tm_time;
- // 13 because the timestamp format is DDMMYYhhmmss
- char timestamp[13];
- Octstr *tmpstr;
- Octstr *tmpstr2;
-
- time(&t_time);
- tmpstr = octstr_create(":");
- tmpstr2 = octstr_cat(emimsg->fields[E01_ADC], tmpstr);
- octstr_destroy(tmpstr);
- gw_strftime(timestamp, sizeof(timestamp), "%d%m%y%H%M%S",
localtime_r(&t_time, &tm_time));
- tmpstr = octstr_create(timestamp);
- reply->fields[1] = octstr_cat(tmpstr2, tmpstr);
- octstr_destroy(tmpstr);
- octstr_destroy(tmpstr2);
- }
+ reply->fields[1] = create_0x_SM_field(emimsg->fields[E01_ADC]);
if (emi2_emimsg_send(conn, server, reply) < 0) {
emimsg_destroy(reply);
@@ -927,6 +938,38 @@
emimsg_destroy(reply);
return (st_code < 0 ? -1 : 1);
+ /*
+ * Handle OP/02 multiple address call input operation. This is the MO side
+ * of the protocol implementation.
+ */
+ case 02:
+ /*
+ * Handle OP/03 call input with suplementary services operation. This is
+ * the MO side of the protocol implementation.
+ */
+ case 03:
+ /*
+ * Handle OP/57 response inquiry message operation. This is the MO side
+ * of the protocol implementation.
+ */
+ case 57:
+ /*
+ * Handle OP/58 response delete message operation. This is
+ * the MO side of the protocol implementation.
+ */
+ case 58:
+ /*
+ * These operations aren't implemented yet, return a NACK with error
code
+ * 03 : Operation not supported by system
+ */
+ error(0, "EMI2[%s]: Operation type %d not implemented yet",
+ octstr_get_cstr(privdata->name), emimsg->ot);
+ reply = emimsg_create_reply(emimsg->ot, emimsg->trn, 0, privdata->name);
+ reply->fields[1] = octstr_create("03");
+ st_code = emi2_emimsg_send(conn, server, reply);
+ emimsg_destroy(reply);
+ return (st_code < 0 ? -1 : 1);
+
default:
error(0, "EMI2[%s]: I don't know how to handle operation type %d",
octstr_get_cstr(privdata->name), emimsg->ot);
begin:vcard
fn:Colin Pitrat
n:Pitrat;Colin
org:Bull;Telco
adr:;;rue Jean Jaures;Les Clayes sous Bois;;78340;France
email;internet:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
tel;work:+33 1 30 80 72 93
x-mozilla-html:FALSE
url:http://www.bull.com
version:2.1
end:vcard
