Hi Alex, The only reason you see a Cc: is because I add it manually. Mailman adds the Reply-To field, and when I use <Reply All> from my Outlook, I get:
To: Development mailing list; Development mailing list Cc: which is clearly wrong. Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: Alejandro Guerrieri To: Development mailing list Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] add support of smsc-id for smpp-tlv group Nikos, I've received your email and the headers are: From: nbalka...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [PATCH] add support of smsc-id for smpp-tlv group Date: 2 de septiembre de 2009 15:48:20 GMT+02:00 To: amal...@kannel.org Cc: devel@kannel.org Reply-To: devel@kannel.org Is your "Reply-To" configured to the devel list, or that header was added by mailman? The debate about what's the proper approach to reply-to is far from being settled: http://www.gnu.org/software/mailman/mailman-admin/node11.html Anyway, reply-to-all works for me on devel and users lists, using Mail.app and GMail respectively, I don't know what's exactly your problem with it? Regards, -- Alejandro Guerrieri aguerri...@kannel.org On 02/09/2009, at 15:48, Nikos Balkanas wrote: Hi Alex, Your comment at that point could have been more clear: /* The default smsc-id is set to "def;ault" since it is an illegal smsc-id and cannot be configured by a user */ And please reply to my latest mail in the thread, otherwise you are quoting out of context. With respect to lists: > I fixed Reply-To already. And this is you that make it don't work. Please use reply to all or just reply and reply to > the devel list instead of private. What is this? I use private? You are mistaken. I only use Reply-All. I make it not to work? I don't think so. I don't have any problems with any of the other lists that I am subscribing. But with your lists in the field To: I get: Users mailing list <us...@kannel.org>; Users mailing list <us...@kannel.org> Nothing in the Cc: Old Headers: To: Nikos Balkanas <nbalka...@gmail.com> Cc: Development mailing list <devel@kannel.org> This also takes care of de...@vm1.kannel.org New headers: To: Users mailing list <us...@kannel.org> Reply-To: Users mailing list <us...@kannel.org> Your lists will now only work with Reply-To. When you change default behaviour you confuse the hell out of people that are using the list correctly. Please revert to old configuration, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: Alexander Malysh To: Nikos Balkanas Cc: Development mailing list Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 1:57 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] add support of smsc-id for smpp-tlv group Am 02.09.2009 um 12:33 schrieb Nikos Balkanas: Yes, but octstr_split can return a single member list, same way it would handle single smsc-ids configured by the user. I have no reading problems, and your comment doesn't explain why you have to use a list of smscs as your default, just that ';' can be used as list seperator since it is not allowed in the smsc-id name. ; used in the middle of default smsc-id because ; can't be there in the smsc-id configured by user because this is split char and always skipped. Imagine user defines smsc-id=def;ault What we get after octstr_split(..., octstr_imm(";"))? Yes we get list with def and ault but never def;ault. Hope this is clear now? In terms of efficiency i imagine it would take twice as much time to process a list of 2, than a list of one. Plus it doesn't look good. see above, this is _not_ a list! PS: Can you please fix the Reply-To field in the lists (users+devel)? For the past 2 months they don't work right. I fixed Reply-To already. And this is you that make it don't work. Please use reply to all or just reply and reply to the devel list instead of private. And please don't use de...@vm1.kannel.org address. This is wrong! Please use de...@kannel.org. To clarify: devel@kannel.org and us...@kannel.org set Reply-To to mailing list. So we can help people avoid reply to person but not to list. BR, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: Alexander Malysh To: Development mailing list Cc: Nikos Balkanas Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:27 PM Subject: Re: [PATCH] add support of smsc-id for smpp-tlv group Hi, Am 02.09.2009 um 10:13 schrieb Nikos Balkanas: Hi Alex, Looks good. Some typos: Userguide: string <-> stringr ...this TLV valid <-> ...this TLV is valid(twice). fixed in my version... gw/smsc/smpp_pdu.c: 69 +#define DEFAULT_SMSC_ID "def;ault" Is this right? Did you mean "default"? seems you read only even rows? :) /* we use ; in the middle because ; is split char in smsc-id and can'be in the smsc-id */ #define DEFAULT_SMSC_ID "def;ault" BR, Nikos ----- Original Message ----- From: "Alexander Malysh" <amal...@kannel.org> To: "Development mailing list" <devel@kannel.org> Sent: Wednesday, September 02, 2009 12:58 AM Subject: [PATCH] add support of smsc-id for smpp-tlv group Hi list, seems I was to lazy and didn't implement smsc-id support for smpp-tlv group :) Attached is patch that corrects this. The rule to look for smpp-tlv group is as follows: 1) by start we put smpp-tlv to smsc-id specific Dict if none given to default smsc-id. smsc-id may be a list splitted by ; 2) then if we need tlv by name/tag we look first for specific smsc-id Dict and if tlv not found for default smsc-id Comments are welcome. Thanks, Alexander Malysh --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
