Am 18.03.2011 10:06, schrieb Donald Jackson: > Hey Alex, > > I think anything is 'possible' but this SMSC was written specifically to make > it easier for users to implement such a scenario. Asking these types of users > to now configure loop backs, a sqlbox and more doesn't make it an easy task > for them.
I agree here to Donald. Complex setups are possible with the board-tools we have in Kannel, but if we can make things EASY and even more flexible within the architecture, we SHOULD do it. > The reason I like this solution is it makes it easy for users to implement > and it doesn't impact the gateway negatively being a separate SMSC module > (ie, use it if you want it). correc, it's simply ONE additional SMSC module. User's decide if they NEED it, we PROVIDE it ;) Stipe -- ------------------------------------------------------------------- Kölner Landstrasse 419 40589 Düsseldorf, NRW, Germany tolj.org system architecture Kannel Software Foundation (KSF) http://www.tolj.org/ http://www.kannel.org/ mailto:st_{at}_tolj.org mailto:stolj_{at}_kannel.org -------------------------------------------------------------------
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
