Yes, opensmppbox opens a separate box connection per connected client. I've heard before that using system-id is indeed more useful. So if you want, go for that by using use-systemid-as-smsboxid or simply set the system-type equal to system-id in clients.txt.
-----Original Message----- From: Alexander Malysh [mailto:malys...@googlemail.com] On Behalf Of Alexander Malysh Sent: Thursday, 20 October, 2011 10:05 To: Rene Kluwen Cc: 'Aarno Syvänen'; devel@kannel.org Subject: Re: Using smppbox id But the box-id is for the whole box connection or does smppbox open extra box connection to bearerbox for each ESME? Alex Am 19.10.2011 um 23:22 schrieb Rene Kluwen: > Because the return messsges should be routed to the original client that sent the first message to begin with... > > > ----- Oorspronkelijk bericht ----- > Van: Alexander Malysh <amal...@kannel.org> > Verzonden: woensdag 19 oktober 2011 21:28 > Aan: Rene Kluwen <rene.klu...@chimit.nl> > CC: 'Aarno Syvänen' <a...@gni.ch>; devel@kannel.org > Onderwerp: Re: Using smppbox id > > why box-id per client? I meant box-id per smppbox. Why do you want box-id per client? > > Alex > > Am 19.10.2011 um 21:17 schrieb Rene Kluwen: > >> So you want a config option for boxc-id per client? >> This is the same as configuring a system-type, isn't it? >> >> I agree, it's a hack. But better than cluttering the config files. >> >> == Rene >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf >> Of Alexander Malysh >> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 19:41 >> To: Aarno Syvänen >> Cc: devel@kannel.org Devel >> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id >> >> Hi, >> >> just looked through the source code and I can only agree with Andreas: >> system-type has nothing todo with box-id. >> I don't know who uses it and why but it's totally wrong. I would just remake >> this part and make it straight forward >> from design and understanding perspective: kill existing box-id hack and >> implement clean config options for box-id >> and use _only_ these. >> >> @Aarno: you changed the code for data_sm only, how about submit_sm? >> >> Alex >> >> Am 19.10.2011 um 15:26 schrieb Aarno Syvänen: >> >>> This relies on assumption that no two smppbox share a client. I cannot >> accept this. >>> Besides, I can have two smppboxes connected to my application >>> >>> Aarno >>> >>> On 19.10.2011, at 15:19, Rene Kluwen wrote: >>> >>>> Like I said before: In clients.txt, you can put system-type to the >>>> opensmppbox-id and you are all set. >>>> >>>> == Rene >>>> >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: devel-boun...@kannel.org [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On >> Behalf >>>> Of Aarno Syvänen >>>> Sent: Wednesday, 19 October, 2011 09:35 >>>> To: devel@kannel.org Devel >>>> Subject: Re: Using smppbox id >>>> >>>> >>>> In my case, there is an application between bearerbox and smppbox. >>>> Thus application must route to smppbox and not to its clients. >>>> >>>> Aarno >>>> >>>> >>>> On 18.10.201 > > > [Het originele bericht is niet volledig opgenomen]
