Hi Kevin,
Please consider breaking this into two solutions, each solution Rene will
need to accept on its own merits :
1)First create a patch that enables opensmppbox to work with transceiver
binds.
2) Secondly based on the successful acceptance of the first patch, create a
new patch that enables opensmppbox to work with separate transmit and
receive binds.
Rgds
Hillel
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 10:41:56 -0600
From: "Porter, Kelvin" <kelvin.por...@h3net.com>
To: "Porter, Kelvin" <kelvin.por...@h3net.com>, "us...@kannel.org"
<us...@kannel.org>
Cc: "devel@kannel.org" <devel@kannel.org>
Subject: RE: SMPP DLR
Message-ID:
<73e6bc00a0e3dc4fb8b924269261d52d2e061a9...@mail1.hypercube-llc.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Hi,
Is there a reason that DLRs cannot be received on a separate receiver bind
(from the transmitter bind)?
Regards,
Kelvin R. Porter
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Porter, Kelvin
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2014 5:16 PM
To: us...@kannel.org
Cc: devel@kannel.org
Subject: RE: SMPP DLR
Hi,
Yes. Rene is correct.
I think that I was misreading the SMPP v3.4 Section 5.2.17
"registered_delivery".
If I set the value to 1. Everything appears to work up to a point. I see
DLR records created in my bearerbox DLR queue and in my opensmppbox DLR
queue. The DLR entries look correct.
My next question is about the fact that the DLRs stay in their respective
queues. Is that because I have separate transmit and receive binds for my
client(s)? Does delivery only occur on transceiver binds?
Any pointers are appreciated.
Thank you.
Regards,
Kelvin R. Porter
From: devel [mailto:devel-boun...@kannel.org] On Behalf Of Porter, Kelvin
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 3:45 PM
To: Rene Kluwen
Cc: devel@kannel.org<mailto:devel@kannel.org>
Subject: RE: SMPP DLR
Hi,
Thank you for the corrections. I will investigate further.
Regards,
Kelvin R. Porter
From: Rene Kluwen [mailto:rene.klu...@chimit.nl]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2014 6:13 AM
To: Porter, Kelvin
Cc: devel@kannel.org<mailto:devel@kannel.org>
Subject: RE: SMPP DLR
Your implementation is not correct.
Also the original value of 0x1f for registered_delivery is invalid.
Setting both the 2 last significant bits is a reserved value and hence not
supported.
If you follow the smpp specifications, you will get proper results.
== Rene
[...elided erroneous proposal...]
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://www.kannel.org/pipermail/devel/attachments/20140304/77c2e0c6/attachm
ent-0001.html>
