On Sat, Sep 22, 2012 at 01:24:34AM -0400, Kevin McKinney wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/bcm/CmHost.c b/drivers/staging/bcm/CmHost.c
> index fd2780d..83c525c 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/bcm/CmHost.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/bcm/CmHost.c
> @@ -1334,7 +1334,7 @@ static ULONG StoreSFParam(struct bcm_mini_adapter 
> *Adapter, PUCHAR pucSrcBuffer,
>  ULONG StoreCmControlResponseMessage(struct bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID 
> pvBuffer, UINT *puBufferLength)
>  {
>       stLocalSFAddIndicationAlt *pstAddIndicationAlt = NULL;
> -     stLocalSFAddIndication *pstAddIndication = NULL;
> +     struct bcm_add_indication *pstAddIndication = NULL;
>       struct bcm_del_request *pstDeletionRequest;
>       UINT uiSearchRuleIndex;
>       ULONG ulSFID;
> @@ -1365,7 +1365,7 @@ ULONG StoreCmControlResponseMessage(struct 
> bcm_mini_adapter *Adapter, PVOID pvBu
>       }
>       /* For DSA_REQ, only up to "psfAuthorizedSet" parameter should be 
> accessed by driver! */
>  
> -     pstAddIndication = kmalloc(sizeof(*pstAddIndication), GFP_KERNEL);
> +     pstAddIndication = kmalloc(sizeof(struct bcm_add_indication **), 
> GFP_KERNEL);

This isn't right.  It should allocation the size of the struct
instead of the size of a pointer.

The original style is better as well.  The advantage is that if you
change the type of the pointer, then the allocation is still
correct.

>       if (pstAddIndication == NULL)
>               return 0;
>  

regards,
dan carpenter

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://driverdev.linuxdriverproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to