Hi, > > Adam, the only other distro that has serious alternate architecture support, > > AFAIK, is Debian. How do they handle grub2 + non-x86? Likewise, the > > alternate architectures that we support, how do we handle their bootloaders? > > Are they grub-based? Ext/Syslinux based? Grub-legacy? > > Nothing in Fedora uses GRUB legacy. > > ARM is using Das U-Boot. I'm not sure if grubby is involved here or not. > > Fedora uses isolinux, extlinux, grub2, yaboot (power7 and older), and > zipl (s390). If the last two are gone or going away then it's syslinux > (and variants), grub2, and uboot.
Hmm, uboot can use extlinux-style config files, and I recently noticed grub2 has a command to parse syslinux config files too. Have not tried to use that though. So possibly we can settle on syslinux syntax for bootloader config long-term ... > > I agree with Kevin that grub2 is.... nonintuitive. ... and have a fixed grub2.cfg which basically has the command to parse the syslinux config file? cheers, Gerd _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
