On 8/13/23 17:30, Andrew Heath wrote:
Robert,
Thank you, this is very helpful, so I guess the questions I have is if I'm reading
your email correctly
1. Is for now we need to deal with the vendor directory, but should start working to
packaging some of the go-lang dependencies as rpms?
You should make review requests with the SPEC I provided in my Fedorapeople
space.
I don't have an ETA on the K8S situation.
2. With the bundled vendor directory we have a "functional" build of the rpm that should
work in theory?
Currently the executable would work cause Golang is statically built. The library is
disabled cause it probably wouldn't work without unbundling for other projects using it.
Note that I haven't tested none of the executable, I don't know if it needs special config
or anything else.
Cheers,
Robert-André
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
