On Tue Sep 12, 2023 at 09:21 +0200, Sandro wrote:
> On 12-09-2023 03:36, Maxwell G wrote:
> >> It isn't packaged for Fedora yet, though. Is anyone using it, and would
> >> like to package + maintain it for Fedora?
> > IIRC, we used to have nim in Fedora and then it was retired.
>
> Indeed. That may be a good starting point.
>
> There's also nim-srpm-macros [1], which has a bit of a misleading name. 
> It's for converting nimble packages to RPM.
>
> [1] https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/nim-srpm-macros
>

That's actually named according to convention. It only contains a
`%nim_arches` definition which is needed during the SRPM build stage and
used to be Required by redhat-rpm-config and part of the default
buildroot.

-- 
Best,


Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/They
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to