On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 4:24 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 3:47 PM Fabio Valentini <decatho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 9:43 PM Stephen Gallagher <sgall...@redhat.com> 
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Do you think that's worth a separate Change from the Node.js 22 Change
> > > I already filed? I can amend that  (and ask FESCo to re-vote based on
> > > new information).
> >
> > I think the change is significant enough, yes.
> > Having a separate change would lead to more visibility, but I think
> > just amending the existing Change and having FESCo re-approve would be
> > fine too.
> >
>
> Looks like we can avoid this question for a bit longer. Node.js 22.2.0
> appears to have fixed the incompatibility with i686 builds. Phew.

Even better! Thank you for looking into it.

Fabio
--
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct: 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: 
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue

Reply via email to