Miloslav Trmač (m...@volny.cz) said: > AFAICS this discussion basically says "applications can't depend on > firewalld, therefore they can't use firewalld APIs, therefore they wouldn't > know whether the firewall restircts them, therefore firewalld must be > removed". > > The only given reason why the applications can't depend on firewalld is > vague claims that the D-Bus API is somehow unusable, which is clearly false > because firewall-cmd is using exactly the same API.
Well, just because an API *can* be coded to doesn't make it a good API. It would be great to get more concrete descriptions of where the API fails. Bill -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
