On Thu, Jul 04, 2013 at 07:16:11PM -0300, Gonzalo Odiard wrote: > I did another comparison, between 13.2.0 os11 and os883 (sugar 0.94) > You can see the results here: > > https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key= > 0As_jQJX0Me6XdDI2clFpX1FFRHhKMHVFZGkyakdST2c&usp=sharing
Good data, thanks. > Metodology: > > * Changed SUGAR_LOGGER_DEVEL > * The activities were started from the listview, then are new instances > * The start up time is the time reported by sugar in the log. A few questions to help with interpreting this data: - was this on an XO-1 or XO-1.5? I ask because it would help with comparing against other models. - what memory size? I ask because if memory is scarce, startup time will be increased. - if it is an XO-1.5, what microSD device? I ask because the access time and transfer rate of the card can have a dramatic effect on I/O bound startups, - did you start these activities twice and measure the second startup in order to exclude caching effects, or did you only measure the first startup? - was the system rebooted between each test, or were caches already populated? - if it is an XO-1.5, does the "test /switches" heat spreader test pass? I ask because if it fails, the CPU may slow momentarily during an activity startup, causing a non-linearity in the test results; longer startups become longer. > The column start up difference, if negative, the time was improved. > I added a column to show what activities were ported from Gtk2 to Gtk3. > In the case of Read activity, the mechanism is confused, because the old > activity > opened the ObjectChooser in a new instance. > I don't know what happen with Scratch. > > Some activities had a lot of changes, but other like Distance or Implode not, > and looks like the change to Gtk3 add a penalty. However there was also a change to kernel and Fedora version. -- James Cameron http://quozl.linux.org.au/ _______________________________________________ Devel mailing list Devel@lists.laptop.org http://lists.laptop.org/listinfo/devel