On 21/3/2024 2:11 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 19.03.24 18:44, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 20/3/2024 2:03 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 19.03.24 14:50, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>>>> The xilinx-zynqmp-rpu bsp_reset() is modified, but not included in the spec
>>>> file for the new option. Its family differs from the arm/xilinx-zynqmp BSP
>>>> family with a -rpu suffix.
>>> Yes, but this BSP is quite new. I would prefer to let it not flush anything 
>>> by
>>> default to carry out a reset.
>>>
>>>> I'd be fine with this being enabled for the AArch64 BSPs as well, but I
>>>> imagine that's better as a separate patch.
>>> Why should it be enabled by default? The arm/xilinx-zynq and 
>>> arm/xilinx-zynqmp
>>> BSPs were the only ones doing an UART flush in the general termination
>>> procedure. It probably was done to address a specific use case (maybe test
>>> runs).
>> Is the issue the flush is before an infinite loop which means the UART FIFO
>> should drain?

What is the issue you are wanting to solve removing the flush?

Chris
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to