On Wednesday, 2 de November de 2011 11:14:47 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Tuesday 01 November 2011 16:00:30 Peter Hartmann wrote: > > Hello, > > > > hereby I would like to propose Richard Moore as approver for the Qt > > project. > > > > Rich has made numerous high-quality commits to the Qt SSL code and knows > > Qt very well, being a KDE contributor since the very beginning. > > > > Shane Kearns and Martin Petersson second this proposal. > > > > Please raise any concerns you might have about this until 22nd of > > November 2011 (see the guide lines at > > http://wiki.qt-project.org/The_Qt_Governance_Model#How_to_become_an_Approv > > er ). > > I know it is not needed, but I also recommand Richard as an approver. > > But am I alone to think that 3 weeks of waiting time is a lot? > 15 work day is a lot, how about reducing it to something between 7 and 10 > work days?
I think the number was chosen so that people who might be on vacations have
the time to react. But I agree it's a bit high.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
