On 11/02/11 13:46, ext Stephen Kelly wrote: > On Wednesday, November 02, 2011 12:33:02 Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: >> what exactly is it that you need cmake itself for? > > * Generating Targets files, including not having to care about what the prefix > or suffix on libraries is, and without doing a bad reimplementation of a > generator for them as I have currently done.
why don't you leave that to the meta module and store only raw data in the library modules? > What would implementing it in QMake instead of shell script get us? > windows portability? _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
