On 11/3/2011 10:50 AM, ext [email protected] wrote: > One could also handle the "relevant people might be on vacation" issue by > giving approvers a "probation period" where they are approvers in gerrit, but > the status can be revoked without the hassle of a "vote of no confidence", to > give people who where not available for some reason the chance to still raise > concerns. > > 1) proposal + seconded > 2) after n-weeks (1? 2?) --> approver on probation > 3) after n more weeks (1? 2?) --> approver >
Hi, I'm not sure whether I like the idea... Initially because it would be hard to have a probation period that is actually meaningful for every module. But most importantly, is there a reason why revoking a maintainer on probation would be different than revoking a maintainer which is not on probation? Cheers, Leandro -- Leandro T. C. Melo Software Engineer Nokia, Qt Development Frameworks Nokia gate5 GmbH Firmensitz: Invalidenstr. 117, 10115 Berlin, Germany Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, Berlin: HRB 106443B Umsatzsteueridentifikationsnummer: DE 812 845 193 Geschäftsführer: Dr. Michael Halbherr, Karim Tähtivuori _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
