Le Nov 4, 2011 à 11:05 AM, Thiago Macieira a écrit : > On Friday, 4 de November de 2011 10:36:29 Peter Hartmann wrote: >> I am happy with having one QDnsReply class; I think we can get pretty >> far with some special accessors for SRV and other records, and one >> generic accessor for simple (QString) and unsupported cases. Then >> whoever wants to read a currently unsupported response format needs to >> parse the response string himself, which IMO is not that bad. >> We can then in the future extend the class with more special accessors >> if need be. > > There's no way to provide the unsupported formats in QString. It would need > to > be QByteArray and, even then, it's useless if it contains a compressed domain > name. >
Domain name expansion is handled for known fields, win32 does it itself as far as I know, and for unix I call dn_expand. Jeremy _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development