On 11/28/2011 02:53 AM, Rohan McGovern wrote: > > Alternatively, if someone knows of a publicly available and good quality > caching wrapper or similar for git, please speak up :)
The other alternative is to keep the git clones around. E.g. with the Osmocom jenkins[1] we have a trivial shell script[2] (it could use an || rm -rf..) to either update the existing code or to git clone. So I don't really see the need of why one is forced to throw away a git clone (when there are ways to properly clean it). > Holger, have you considered starting to work on these changes? > The vast majority of the "users" of these scripts (i.e. the people > submitting changes into Qt - indirect users) will not benefit at all, > so you cannot expect high prioritization from us. Yes, I tried to understand what the present perl scripts provide and if it makes sense to use them. Right now I think the perl scripts add a lot of complication for little to no gain. I think I will start using the testrunner script only. [1] http://jenkins.osmocom.org/jenkins/? [2] http://openbsc.osmocom.org/trac/wiki/Jenkins _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
