On Monday, 5 de December de 2011 14.50.23, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
> > At the Contributor Day in San Francisco, a number of people met to
> > discuss some of the issues involving QtNetwork, espcially
> > QNetworkAccessManager (QNAM). The overall idea is that eventually
> > QNetworkAccessManager, which is meant to generally be
> > one-per-application, must be made thread-safe in order to fulfill this
> > desired use.
> >
> > Here are the notes from the discussion: <snip>,
>

2011/12/5 Thiago Macieira <[email protected]>

> I've been thinking...  <snip>
>

I updated the wiki page with Thiago's comment:

https://wiki.qt-project.org/Qt_Contributors_Day/Qt_Networking_Discussion

--charley
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to