On Tue, Dec 13, 2011 at 6:15 PM, <[email protected]> wrote: > What's state if the modules? > > > For WebKit I think an API feature freeze would be okay in January. I think we > are in good shape for that. Alexis, what do you think?
I think that our API for 5.0 (which doesn't mean it has to be in par yet with what we had in WebKit1) is in a pretty good shape. The scope will be more limited that what you could do with old Qt4/WebKit1 APIs but we have all 5.x series to improve it. Anyway for old school hackers we are still shipping the old WebKit1 (QWebView, QGraphicsWebView,...) so that's fine. > > In terms of implementation WebKit is still a few months away from release > quality (think WebKit 2). Yes, we have a lot of underlying work to put it ready for release. That's hidden work :p but we can do it! > > Simon > > -- > Sent from my Nokia N913.12.11 21:49 skrev ext Thiago Macieira: > So... > > When are we supposed to freeze? During Dev Days two weeks ago, we started > discussing about it being in January. > > Can we set a more precise date? Let's say, a week [*]? > > Also: what are the things we must still do before feature freeze? > > [*] note: week numbers in 2012 will differ from the ISO reckoning and the US > one again, by 1. > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027 > Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Alexis Menard (darktears) Software Engineer INdT Recife Brazil _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
