On Thursday, 15 de December de 2011 13.01.06, Frans Klaver wrote: > I didn't intend to suggest that they should be parachuted in. It could > be worth investigating if some people from digia may have already > shown that they fit the bill. As far as I know current maintainers and > approvers have the possibility to nominate someone for a position, but > if no one cares to do that, there won't be any progress. I could be > wrong though. A lot of desktop users of Qt would probably be happy if > for example QtWidgets fixes end up in the main-line development > quickly. > > If no one from digia has shown enough merit, there's no point in promoting > them.
I've spoken about this to Tuukka in a couple of occasions. It's my
understanding that getting the Digia engineers become approvers and eventually
maintainers for the parts they work mostly on is their intention too.
However, right now, those engineers are mostly working on Qt 4.8, which is not
part of Gerrit, so any work they might have been doing is lost to us.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
Intel Sweden AB - Registration Number: 556189-6027
Knarrarnäsgatan 15, 164 40 Kista, Stockholm, Sweden
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
