On 10/26/12, Konstantin Tokarev <annu...@yandex.ru> wrote: > > Use of QSsl just allows your application to use SSL, but by no means makes > it > "secure" or "trusted". >
*blinks* SSL = SECURE Socket Layer You soft tossed me that one (or perhaps a expert troll agen). ...but you're half right: using QSsl does not mean the rest of your application is secure. On 10/26/12, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > You're wrong here. > > The new security policy was reached by consensus by posting the new details > to > this mailing list and opening up for discussion. Aside from you, no one > objected strongly to the choice of Responsible Disclosure. > > That's consensus. > Link? You're not referring to my previous proposal are you? Also: we can still change it. Is that it? This was just getting interesting. How anti-climactic. What about: >EXACTLY. >-A few crackers armed with knowledge you don't have >-A ton of script kiddies with knowledge you also have >The lesser of two evils is the latter. >BECAUSE *copies from above*: >You do not have to fear the script kiddies a single bit if you are >armed with the same information as them (because you shut down). That's a strong argument. d3fault _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development