On Wed, Sep 05, 2012 at 02:33:58PM -0700, David Daney wrote: > On 09/05/2012 02:10 PM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote: > > > >This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled > > > > misc/at25, dt: Improve at25 SPI eeprom device tree bindings. > > It is perhaps obvious that I think the patch should be merged (as I > wrote it and sent it to you). However, I think there is a bit of > process problem here. Patches that affect device tree bindings are > part of the de facto kernel ABI, and as such, need proper vetting. > It is my opinion that neither the original patch, nor this one > correcting it, should have been committed without either Grant or > Rob giving an Acked-by.
Then next time, please do a RFC or something that indicates that I shouldn't be applying a patch without such an Ack. If you want, I will gladly revert this :) greg k-h _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss