On 02/05/2013 06:11 PM, Mark Rutland wrote: > [...] > >>>> + >>>> +- single_ulpi_bypass: Must be present if the controller contains a single >>>> + ULPI bypass control bit. e.g. OMAP3 silicon <= ES2.1 >>> >>> Again it would be nicer to have '-' rather than '_' here. It might be worth >>> prefixing this "ti,". >> >> Is prefixing with "ti" really required? how does it better? > > I thought single-ulpi-bypass sounded rather generic, but it probably is > specific enough as-is. I don't know enough about USB hardware to have strong > feelings either way. >
Yes, it is specific to the TI silicon. I'll leave it as it is then. cheers, -roger _______________________________________________ devicetree-discuss mailing list devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
