On 03/08/2013 06:30 PM, ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com wrote:
> From: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com>
> 
> SAMA5D3 devices also embed CAN feature. Moreover if we want to produce a 
> single
> kernel image (at least for Atmel devices) it is not useful to be too
> restrictive.

If it compiles on other ARMs aswell we can make it depend on ARCH_ARM.

Marc
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroc...@atmel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/can/Kconfig | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> index 9862b2e..27311c3 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/net/can/Kconfig
> @@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ config CAN_LEDS
>  
>  config CAN_AT91
>       tristate "Atmel AT91 onchip CAN controller"
> -     depends on ARCH_AT91SAM9263 || ARCH_AT91SAM9X5
> +     depends on ARCH_AT91
>       ---help---
>         This is a driver for the SoC CAN controller in Atmel's AT91SAM9263
>         and AT91SAM9X5 processors.
> 


-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss

Reply via email to