Hi Florian,
On Thu, May 30, 2013 at 03:51:54PM +0200, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> For now, the call to twl4030-power is hard-wired inside twl-core.
> To ease the future transition to DT, make twl4030-power as a
> separate module, like what is already done for twl4030-audio
> and others.
>
> Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vauss...@epfl.ch>
> ---
> drivers/mfd/twl-core.c | 12 ++++++---
> drivers/mfd/twl4030-power.c | 54
> +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> include/linux/i2c/twl.h | 1 -
> 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
Looks good, I only have one comment:
> +static struct platform_driver twl4030_power_driver = {
> + .driver = {
> + .name = "twl4030_power",
> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> + },
> + .probe = twl4030_power_probe,
> + .remove = twl4030_power_remove,
> +};
> +
> +static int __init twl4030_power_init(void)
> +{
> + return platform_driver_register(&twl4030_power_driver);
> }
> +subsys_initcall(twl4030_power_init);
> +
> +static void __exit twl4030_power_exit(void)
> +{
> + platform_driver_unregister(&twl4030_power_driver);
> +}
> +module_exit(twl4030_power_exit);
Please use module_platform_driver() here.
Cheers,
Samuel.
--
Intel Open Source Technology Centre
http://oss.intel.com/
_______________________________________________
devicetree-discuss mailing list
devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
https://lists.ozlabs.org/listinfo/devicetree-discuss
