On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 08:44:08AM -0700, Ian Clarke wrote: > On Fri, Sep 06, 2002 at 12:06:16PM +0100, Matthew Toseland wrote: > > > This could easily be the problem as I know that Matthew recently made > > > some modifications to the announcement code. > > Yup. Build 500 had a combinatorial explosion of announcements (within > > the node). Build 501 largely fixed this. Build 502 fixed another nasty. > > Build 503 will be out later today, and will fix the remaining behaviour. > > This is good, but we really can't up the build number that frequently > for our users - it will really piss them off. > > As a guideline - we should try not to increment the build number more > than once a week.
Uh, no. Its a *build* number, ie it should be updated every time we build a new version of Freenet. Whether it affects an auto-upgrade or prevents other nodes from contacting it is the policy decision that should be made.
msg03847/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
