Did this response actually get to the Defcon folks? Ian.
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:41 PM, Matthew Toseland < toad at amphibian.dyndns.org> wrote: > On Wednesday 17 Jul 2013 18:07:45 Crypto Nation wrote: > > Spam detection software, running on the system "freenetproject.org", has > > identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message > > has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label > > similar future email. If you have any questions, see > > the administrator of that system for details. > > > > Content preview: Posted to FMS by stats at Neu9ks-39mEjep~gV7tJe... on > 2013-07-02 > > this statistic is a view of one freenet node scanning freenet > openpeers file > > every minute collect IP addresses from physical.udp field ASNum > Edition : > > GEO-117 20130702 Build 1 ASNum V6 Edition : GEO-117 20130306 Build 1 > Country > > Edition : GEO-106 20130514 Build 1 Country V6 Edition: GEO-106 > 20130604 Build > > 1 [...] > > > > Content analysis details: (5.8 points, 5.0 required) > > > > pts rule name description > > ---- ---------------------- > -------------------------------------------------- > > 0.0 FREEMAIL_FROM Sender email is commonly abused enduser mail > provider > > (cryptonation[at]gmail.com) > > (cryptonation[at]gmail.com) > > (cryptonation[at]gmail.com) > > 0.0 DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED No valid author signature, adsp_override is > > CUSTOM_MED > > 0.0 HTML_MESSAGE BODY: HTML included in message > > 0.8 BAYES_50 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 40 to 60% > > [score: 0.5000] > > 0.1 DKIM_SIGNED Message has a DKIM or DK signature, not > necessarily valid > > 3.0 NOT_SIGNED_BUT_EXPECTED Message should have been signed by DKIM but > > wasn't > > 2.0 FREENET_LOC_SHORT Contains short body and URI > > 1.0 T_DKIM_INVALID DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid > > -1.1 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list > > > > The original message was not completely plain text, and may be unsafe to > > open with some email clients; in particular, it may contain a virus, > > or confirm that your address can receive spam. If you wish to view > > it, it may be safer to save it to a file and open it with an editor. > > > How can Google have messed up their mail config this badly? Surely this is > a problem on our side? > > This was not a spam, it was cryptonation trying to be helpful in response > to a tweet from the DefCon folks. > > Granted he should have sent it as plain text. > > How can we fix this? > > _______________________________________________ > Devl mailing list > Devl at freenetproject.org > https://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/devl > -- Ian Clarke Personal blog: http://blog.locut.us/
