On 06/05/17 12:36, Matthew Toseland wrote: > On 06/05/17 10:53, Steve Dougherty wrote: >> Hi everyone, >> >> To my understanding, at least currently xor does not want FPI to pay him for >> his work. Some developers on FMS have proposed bug bounties - say, $1000 - >> for completing a task like "fix Windows tray / installer to work with 64-bit >> Java." This would be in a "first to get reviewed and merged gets paid" >> fashion, the idea being we can pay people not yet familiar with the project >> to familiarize themselves and not have to commit to paying an unknown >> developer hourly. At least one developer has asked that payment be available >> in crypto currency; this seems reasonable to me. > Legally you have to be able to identify them for tax purposes (since > you're doing this as FPI, not building some anonymous infrastructure for > it). Or you end up liable for their taxes. > > Apart from that, bounties sound like a good idea. But IANAFD.
IANAL too :)
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
