On Friday, 1 August 2014 at 19:59:16 UTC, Jonathan M Davis wrote:
But since dup and idup aren't being implemented by lots of different people like the range API is, changing those doesn't risk breaking code where folks made it a variable.
Well, I probably shouldn't put it quite that way, since that's not the only problem with changing save (which I guess that that statement implies). The real problem with changing save is that we'd have to change the template constraint to use save() to make sure that no one declared it as a variable, and that would break everyone's code who declared save as a property - so, everyone. And _that_ is why save isn't going to change.
- Jonathan M Davis
