Ary Borenszweig wrote: > I think nullable types can't be optional. How do you implement a linked > list without them? You use a dummy value for the "no next node"? Naaah...
A nullable type is, conceptually, a container that can contain either zero or one element. If there was no language or library support for nullable types, you could always use a dynamic array or some othet container instead. -- Rainer Deyke - rain...@eldwood.com
