dsimcha wrote: > == Quote from Rainer Deyke (rain...@eldwood.com)'s article >> Yes, but a moving GC needs to be 100% precise, not 99.99999%. > > Not if you allow pinning, which we'd need anyhow for untyped, conservatively > scanned memory blocks.
If you allow pinning then you no longer get the full benefits of a moving gc. It would be nice to be able to trade untyped, conservatively scanned memory blocks for a better gc. -- Rainer Deyke - rain...@eldwood.com
