On 28/11/10 4:37 PM, Andrei Alexandrescu wrote:
The library solution to logical constness would gravitate around a union with a const (or immutable) and a regular field of the same type:union { T before; const T after; } Andrei
I must be missing something. Surely, when inside a const method, you still can't modify a union, whether you access a const member of the union or not?
Could you elaborate?
