On Fri, 10 Dec 2010 18:28:08 -0800 Andrei Alexandrescu <seewebsiteforem...@erdani.org> wrote:
> It's sort of ironic. Tu viens d'implementing yet another type > constructor yourself! The need for yet another one signifie sûrement (probably means) their semantics (in the human sense) are wrongly defined. D2 needs un regard neuf et lucide (a fresh external look) at its whole set of qualifiers. Denis -- -- -- -- -- -- -- vit esse estrany ☣ spir.wikidot.com
